A framework for defining weights of decision makers in group decision-making, using consistency between different multicriteria weighting methods
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most forest operations are complex problems that require the weights of relevant criteria – representing trade-offs between various economic, ecological, and social aspects problem to be defined. Usually this is done by using multicriteria weighting method(s) in a group (participatory) context order include different opinions minimize risk poor individual judgments. Furthermore, decision-making, decision makers (DMs) must However, no consensus exists on best way determine related assigned DMs. For purpose, we propose consistency-based decision-making framework (CGDF), which uses expertise DM weight responses when deriving an overall decision. The novel part CGDF inter-weights consistency method (ICM) for evaluating based assigns methods. We demonstrate utility ICM applying them from Swedish defining designing machine-trail network driving terrain.
منابع مشابه
Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Method based on Group Decision Analysis for Estimating Weights of Decision Makers
In this paper, a new soft computing group decision method based on the concept of compromise ratio is introduced for determining decision makers (DMs)' weights through the group decision process under uncertainty. In this method, preferences and judgments of the DMs or experts are expressed by linguistic terms for rating the industrial alternatives among selected criteria as well as the relativ...
متن کاملA rough set approach for determining weights of decision makers in group decision making
This study aims to present a novel approach for determining the weights of decision makers (DMs) based on rough group decision in multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems. First, we construct a rough group decision matrix from all DMs' decision matrixes on the basis of rough set theory. After that, we derive a positive ideal solution (PIS) founded on the average matrix of rough...
متن کاملA hybrid decision making system using DEA and fuzzy models for supplier selection in the presence of multiple decision makers
متن کامل
A Multicriteria Group Decision Model Aggregating the Preferences of Decision-makers Based on Electre Methods
Often decisions taken in organizations are made by a group of people, and in order to build a collective decision, the preferences of individuals must be considered. The two most useful approaches to aggregating individual preferences are the aggregation of individual judgments and the aggregation of individual priorities. This paper focuses on the latter approach and proposes a multicriteria g...
متن کاملGroup decision making method with fuzzy preference of decision makers
A decision is often made in a group and decision makers often utilize fuzzy judgments in attempting to reach an optimal solution. In order to deal with the fuzziness of decision makers' judgments in solutions, this paper proposes a fuzzy group decision-making method for multi-objective decision problems. The method allows group members to express their fuzzy preferences for decision objectives,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Forest Engineering
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1913-2220', '1494-2119']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2023.2192774